BunusRadar Research Hub
Original benchmark data, pricing trackers, and accuracy studies — all produced by BunusRadar's editorial team using our published methodology. Free to cite with attribution.
All data is collected under standardized conditions. See Methodology for full evaluation criteria. Last updated: October 2026.
AI Coding Assistant Benchmark 2026
50 standardized coding tasks across 5 real repositories · 6 tools tested · Methodology: BunusRadar v1.0
| Tool | Task Success | Bugs Introduced | Median Time | Cost / Task | Halluc. Rate | BR Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOPCursor (Claude backend) | 91% | 2 | 13 min | $0.12 | 4% | 9.1/10 |
| Claude Code (CLI) | 89% | 3 | 15 min | $0.18 | 5% | 8.7/10 |
| GitHub Copilot | 82% | 6 | 18 min | $0.08 | 9% | 7.9/10 |
| Gemini Code Assist | 80% | 7 | 17 min | $0.10 | 11% | 7.6/10 |
| ChatGPT (GPT-4o) | 78% | 8 | 20 min | $0.22 | 13% | 7.2/10 |
| Tabnine (Enterprise) | 71% | 11 | 16 min | $0.06 | 18% | 6.5/10 |
Tested September 2026 on MacBook Pro M3 Max. Task suite: 50 tasks across 5 real-world repos (Node.js API, React app, Python CLI, Rust library, SQL migrations). Cost calculated at public pricing tiers. See full methodology.
LLM Pricing & Token Efficiency Tracker 2026
Public API pricing for leading LLMs · Updated: October 2026 · Context: per million tokens
| Model | Input / 1M Tokens | Output / 1M Tokens | Context Window | Speed | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-4o (OpenAI) | $2.50 | $10.00 | 128K | Fast | General reasoning, code |
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | $3.00 | $15.00 | 200K | Fast | Long docs, nuanced writing |
| Gemini 1.5 Pro | $3.50 | $10.50 | 1M | Medium | Massive context, multimodal |
| Mistral Large 2 | $2.00 | $6.00 | 128K | Fast | European data sovereignty |
| Llama 3.1 405B (self-hosted) | ~$0.80* | ~$0.80* | 128K | Variable | Privacy, no API dependency |
| DeepSeek V3 | $0.27 | $1.10 | 64K | Fast | Cost-sensitive, coding tasks |
* Llama self-hosted cost estimate based on AWS g5.12xlarge instance at $5.67/hr, processing 1M tokens/hr. Actual cost varies. Pricing snapshots from official provider pages, October 2026. Prices change frequently — verify before budgeting.
AI Image Generator Accuracy Test 2026
100 standardized prompts across 6 tools · Scored on: prompt adherence, realism, stylistic range
| Tool | Prompt Adherence | Realism | Stylistic Range | Avg Speed | Free Tier | BR Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOPMidjourney v6.1 | 88% | 9.2/10 | 9.5/10 | ~30s | No | 9.3/10 |
| DALL-E 3 (OpenAI) | 92% | 8.8/10 | 8.4/10 | ~15s | No | 8.9/10 |
| Stable Diffusion 3.5 | 81% | 8.6/10 | 9.0/10 | ~5s* | Yes | 8.5/10 |
| Ideogram 2.0 | 87% | 8.4/10 | 8.7/10 | ~20s | Yes | 8.4/10 |
| Adobe Firefly 3 | 84% | 8.3/10 | 8.2/10 | ~10s | No | 8.1/10 |
| Bing Image Creator | 79% | 7.8/10 | 7.5/10 | ~25s | Yes | 7.5/10 |
* SD3.5 speed measured on local inference (M3 Max). Cloud API speed will vary. Scores are composite of prompt adherence (50%), realism (30%), and stylistic range (20%).
How to Cite This Research
This data is published under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0). You may republish, quote, or summarize it with attribution.